Muhammad ibn Al-Hasan commented: “The meaning here applies if it has not decomposed, because if it has decomposed, seven buckets must be drawn from it, as explained in the earlier report.” Then the Shaykh (Al-Mufid), may Allah سبحانه وتعالى support him, said: "If a sparrow or something similar falls into it, one bucket must be drawn." This is supported by what was mentioned earlier in the narration of Amr ibn Sa'id Al-Mada'ini, from Musaddiq ibn Sadaqah, from Ammar Al-Sabati, from Abu Abdullah عليه السلام. He said: Abu Abdullah عليه السلام was asked, and after narrating the hadith, he said: "The smallest thing that may fall into the well, like a sparrow, requires one bucket to be drawn." Then the Shaykh (Al-Mufid), may Allah سبحانه وتعالى support him, said: "If droppings of sheep, camels, gazelles, or their urine fall into it, it does not cause impurity. The same ruling applies to the droppings and urine of animals whose meat is permissible to eat. It does not spoil the water, nor does it make clothes or the body impure by contact with it, except for the droppings of domesticated chickens (dajjaj jalalah). If their droppings fall into a small amount of water, five buckets must be drawn from it. And if it touches the clothes or body, washing with water is required." It is thus established, based on the verse and the narrations previously mentioned, that whatever retains the name of "water" remains pure unless it is definitively contaminated by impurity. In such a case, it must be avoided. As for these cases mentioned, there is no evidence in the Shariah prohibiting the use of water affected by them. Therefore, the ruling of purity remains intact. Similarly, declaring clothes impure by contact with these substances requires a legal proof. Since no such proof exists in the Shariah, the ruling of purity must remain. This is further supported by traditions narrated