والثاني ان تكون رخصة للدخول في الصلاة لمن يعلم أنه يسقط الشفق قبل فراغه من الصلاة لانه متى كان الامر على ما وصفناه فانه يجزيه وليس في شئ من هذه الاخبار انه يجوز له أن يصلي قبل سقوط الشفق وان علم انه يفرغ منها مع بقاء الشفق فإذا احتمل ما ذكرناه حملناه على ذلك والذي يدل على ان ذلك جائز ما رواه
The second (interpretation) is that it is a concession to enter the prayer for one who knows that the shafaq will disappear before he finishes the prayer, because whenever the matter is as we have described, then it suffices him. And there is nothing in any of these narrations indicating that it is permissible for him to pray before the disappearance of the shafaq while knowing that he will finish the prayer while the shafaq still remains. So, if the meaning we mentioned is possible, we interpret it accordingly. What indicates that this is permissible is what has been narrated:
